User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
Private
fedi moonbat
he/they
anarcho whatever
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
@0utside0utsider what a great text, chuang is such a gem
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
i think i probably annoy all the admins of the instances i'm on because i only post about very spicey and controversial things, they probably wish i would post wholesome memes or something
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
problematic gender rant, castration perhaps i have identified with the phallus, have i joined the dark side? maybe i should get on estrogen and trip on shrooms

so uh, castration, i used to thinking about that a lot, just chopping it off, but also self-mutilation of body parts, cutting out chunks of flesh, just stabbing myself, i don't know if that is strictly related to gender dysphoria so much as a particular pathology of viewing my body as other and a burden, or desire to be a eunich basically rid of sexual desire, and so maybe linked to christian sexual repression, there's a lot of eunich shit in stoicism and buddhism which i read in late teens, like "the body is a corpse" is a saying in both traditions.

I'm not really into cock and ball torture but wonder if men who are into that had similar histories
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
egg_irl problematic gender rant that egg_irl subreddit sure is weird and culty, i mean ironically/unironically trying to pill people into being trans, i suppose ritual awakening is an ancient means of personality change and this is just a modern version of that, and there's lots of people who come out or find themselves like that, but explicitly trying to induce some type of crisis, rather than encourage sober and non-judgemental self-reflection, it doesn't seem like the best way to encourage people to re-examine their gender... but one could make a case that closeted people are on many levels of self denial/repression/alienation/disphoria and so leaning into this psychodrama is necessary for some.

I would like to hear trans peeps take on this, i've seen many people say something about egg_irl being toxic or whatever, but i was never in that community other than just passively looking at their memes, they are fascinating aesthetic artifacts for sure

personally i went thru that and came out like yeah i'm basically cis, i do have gender disphoria and i fantasize about being a woman, but also like having muscles and a dick and capacity for violence, and not having to bath regularly or put much thought into my appearance -- i suppose i could be a woman and keep all those things, just i'm just lazy and went with the default, idk if that makes me cis or nonbinary, it's just not terribly important to me, so i'd rather just put my gender as male, i don't really identity with my cultures definition of masculinity, but i don't think i'm a woman, i think i would know by now lol, trans people seem to really know, maybe more so than cis people, and that's kinda my issue with egg_irl it's like okay, maybe some people need to just accept what they already know, but basically all cis people are
confused about gender, and for many there is a level of volition and self creation, you can choose to change genders if you want, and what you really want that might take some time to figure out, and you shouldn't make it into some urgent thing where you're obligated to transition or you're a liar and a failure, a certain degree of guilt or regret and insecurity is unavoidable considering hetero-patriachal transphobia but it should also be a beautiful journey of self discovery where trans people are treated with kindness and patience and acceptance.

in my experience gender and sexual identity isn't really a static thing, like my sexual compass would oscilate pretty dramatically between women and men, as with whether i felt/acted more gay/straight, now if egg_irl was a thing when i was like 16 i might have gone trans, as I was always very androgynous and bi and would dress in drag and i also didn't really fit in with "gay" men, who universally said i was
straight, maybe that's just bi erasure, but there's something to that, maybe little bit of homoeroticism and cross dressing is just totally a normal aspect of being a straight cis man.
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
principled disagreement, international solidarity i'm trying to be nice to tankies okay, but i do we think we need state principle differences honestly if we're going to operate together respectfull on things we agree upon, and when it comes to the practical political problems facing people in capitalist core countries ( the US, Europe, Canada, Austrailia etc. ) as well as those is their Periphery ( Africa and Latin America) we basically agree on most things like opposing fascism and transnational corporations, supporting unions, opposing war and genocide etc. We shouldn't fight about things that don't matter like shit that happened 100 years ago on the other side of the planet, but we also need to listen to Socialists in China's sphere of Influence. These western tanks would benefit much by listening to contemporary Indian Marxists who have a long history diverse and sophisticated analysis ( they actually read their theory lmao) and put out much material in English.
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
i'm a moist
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
@Taweret they should read the kama sutra, lots of good tips on gay sex
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
on the socialist character of china @yogthos @Arindam

Anyway, i won't continue to bother on this, i will check out that book, i'm sure there are some facts in there, maybe i'll learn something but i'm sure i'll disagree lol, i think you are taking this naive line because you think it's necessary to defend actually existing socialism, but there are plenty of Marxist Leninists even who disagree with you, like in the Philippines, Inda, Nepal, Russian Federation, there are communist parties who identify china as an emergent imperialist power, state capitalists etc. this isn't just a
western line, i'm not a ml or maoist, i'm just saying you can be a principled communist / anti-imperialist without taking this uncritical line.

Personally i would like Xi more if he killed more billionaires and nationalized large sections of the economy, and it's reasonable to say that
could happen, the PRC has the institutional ability to do this unlike western countries, so maybe there is this proletarian character of the chinese state, but i think it's certainly dormant, and would take a long protracted struggle to oust the bourgeoisie from the halls of power.
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
on the socialist character of china @yogthos @Arindam

To clarify, I'm not saying the Socialist Content of the PRC means nothing, and i think there are genuine socialist aspects to the current system that have survived Dengism, there are many positive and democratic aspects to china that gets ignored, when it comes to labor relations or local municipalities or internal decision making within the CPC, this actually gives me hope, considering all the militant unionism that's been happening in China.

The importance of getting this right lies in Solidarity with chinese workers, who often are eploited by the exact same transnational mega-corporations that we in the west are struggling against. Imagine the damage we could do to Apple if unions in California coordinated with those in China. We should combat racist ant-communist fearmongering about China, but it's just a fact that the CPC leadership is full of ambitious and currupt bourgeois, and everywhere workers are oppressed by capitalists, even if the capitalist calls themselves socialist.

And i mean hey, planning is good, having nationalized industries and strong regulations are just good governance, I would even say many of Deng's early reforms were perfectly fine, loosening restrictions on small proprietors, a little market activity is fine, but then there's all the big megacorporations and their direct ties to Western Finance and Big Tech, these are our enemies here and they're the enemies of Chinese workers.
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
on the socialist character of china @yogthos @Arindam

When i say "run by capitalists" i think it's clear i'm referring to the leadership, I could if i wanted to list out influential members of the central committee or chinese parliament who billions ( many) or millionaires (most) with massive stock portfolios, i'm not going to waste both of our times dragging this out, but saying that the CPC has "almost no capitalists" is just silly, i mean those billionaires that get executed that are almost always influential CPC members, sure the leadership aren't all super rich, and most rank and file members of the CPC are workers, this is true of basically every political party in the world because workers necessarily make up the majority under capitalism.

I find it strange that you can refer to "the chinese people" as some great mass who thinks exactly the same and all those 2 billion people happen to agree with you. I never claimed I know china better than chinese people, but people there are surely aware that they have to get up every day and work at a job with makes capitalists richer, so no i don't
know china but i think you also have an oversimplified view of Chinese society that handwaves away facts and lived experiences. You can also read things by academics and activists, chinese Marxists who will tell you basically what I've said. And if you just keep up with chinese mainstream media, you'd see how silly it is, these days china is very consumerist, the economic press discourse is neoliberal as hell, it's all about growth for it's own sake and securing foriegn investment, pop culture is all about success status and conspicuous consumption, it's capitalist as hell You're not gonna here the term "dictatorship of the proletariat" like ever lmao. Ya'll really think China is a a country where everyone is an ML, no Dengism i.e. Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is really ideologically
different from old school MLism, Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, contra Western Socialism, is quite alright with capitalism, actually, so long as the state gets a cut and no single capitalist gets too big for it's bridges.

China is a diverse country, even within leadership of CPC or among policymakers and academics there is serious disagreement about what socialism means, or how the economy should be managed. class conflict also is an intensifying problem with increased stratification. It's actually a serious threat to the whole system -- a western backed billionaire led insurrection is a real danger which is why Xi has to reign in so many billionaires, because there's so many -- so if you want to have some grasp of current development there you can't rule out these facts.
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
on war it's bad basically
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
on the socialist character of china @yogthos @Arindam

because of word limits i had to remove a lot of qualifying statements i'm sorry if that comes off as blunt, i think there's a fundamental disagreement here as to what constitutes socialism, i would grant that China is State Socialist, in similar way to USSR or Cuba (while these are all also unique cases ) but hitherto existing state socialism has always state capitalism, it's just Capital controlled by the state and managed by a Socialist Party, that's not the same as socialism/communism as a
mode of production i.e. collective ownership and control over the means of production...

Anyway, i used to be hard line on this, but i think we can agree to disagree to some extent, since to those of us outside of China and it's sphere of influence what we think as to the "true nature" of a society we are not apart of, whose langauge most of us can't even understand, that's not as important as things we have direct control over ( challenging our own imperialist governmnets ) But since we should seek links with progressive workers inside china, simply parroting what the PRC says could hinder genuine solidarity efforts

So for example, regardless of what we think as to the "socialist character" of china, or even then territorial claims, we can still oppose how the US is antagonizing the conflict in Taiwan in a way that only benefits their arms industry while putting millions of lives in danger.
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
on the socialist character of china @yogthos @Arindam

feel free to disagree but

in terms of the class composition of Chinese society, it's very difficult to say that a
dictatorship of the proletariat exists, i don't think the chinese proletariate controls the state, i don't even think the CPC is run by workers. You could say that it once did, the first 2-3 decades of the PRC had an unmistakable class character, the leaders of the new government almost exclusively came from worker/peasant backgrounds, and there were countless communes and cooperatives many of which still exist. But there was a massive liberalization that happened in the 80's and today they have an incredibly stratified society, with a large bourgeoisie and middle class, lots of local level corruption, real estate bubbles,, regular strikes and labour disputes between (western backed) chinese capitalists and workers unions, all the problems every capitalist economy has, albeit with a nominally communist party in charge, a distinct political and legal system etc.


The CPC is controlled by capitalists, you can't represent the proletariat while being a billionaire stakeholder is a massive corporation, let's all go to duckduckgo and type in "Xi Panama Papers" the CPC has a huge nepotism problem and the children of the first generation of party leaders are all super rich, almost like the used their positions as state bureaucrats to enter the bourgeoisie, the same thing basically happened in USSR only china never had a radical break but instead were able to more smoothly transition into capitalist development while preserve the old Stalinist state apparatus.

China's economy is also "coupled" with the US economy, the US outsource basically all of it's manufacturing and China has taken up most of it. There's a very large and vocal pro china wing Wall Street gossip

I don't think speed of development has anything to do with whether a state has "socialist character" David Harvey clearly knows nothing about china, because china does have private property enshrined in it's legal system, Western legal systems also have
eminent domain or similar terms for "the government can jack your shit", a generous reading here is that in China private property is not seen as some sacred right the way the English do(fair). A Bourgeois state could nationalize large sections of it's economy or put it under direct state control, as happened in US during WWII, the Marshal Plan and US Occupation/Reconstruction of Japan and Korea. i guess that's "socialist" in the way that Norway or Sweden are.

One could say the different between a "dictatorship fo the proletariate" and bourgeois Keynesianism or Social Democracy is the ideological content, the chinese call what they do Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, i it's just deeply opportunistic in a class collaborationist sense. But socialist thinking has influenced chinese state policy in a way that's benefited poor and working people.
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
@Ashedryden well i say we have a first amendment right to call for mass strikes and occupations at amazon warehouses and offices
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
@artemis AI checkers are absolute scams, schools are being conned into forcing their students to submit content to be used as AI training datasets against their will, this shit should be illegal
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
@kopper i really wish that it was lol, the fedi instance i've been working on is basically an attempt to do misskey in php

the fedi instances written in php i'm aware of are Friendica, Hubzilla and Streams, also kbin and derivatives, but those are forms of PostMill ( of raddle infamy )
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
@kaiiak for real, i'm not getting on that shit lol
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
@zulakeflowers you can tell by the way i walk i'm a ladies man, no time to talk
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
@cyrus thanks, will read more

Zot seems to address similar issues, but they still use AP as a "transport layer" from what i understnad. The documentation on Zot is pretty sparse from what, I've seen and it doesn't do well to separate to Zot as a protocol from Hubzilla as a platform ( which supports both AP and Diaspora federation like Friendica )
hubzilla.org/help/en/developer/zot_protocol#What_is_Zot_

There is one other implementation i know of called Streams which looks pretty cool
codeberg.org/streams/streams
User avatar
lumpen 🍉 III @scrum@wanderingwires.net
1y
@cyrus great article, i've probably been guilty of spreading FUD about AT so I do appreciate and honest and informed assessment, and tbh most of my and other people's opposition to AT is rooted in political anti-corporate considerations that have noting to do wit the protocol as such.

I still don't quite understand the benefits of AT over AP, since as you explain black lists and filters can be / already are implemented on AP based instances, it's just not baked into the protocol -- the only benefit I can see is less resources since small instances don't have to worry about caching other instances data, but this isn't necessarily bad, because a well known issue with amateur run small instances is spotty uptime, since inboxes are cached locally you may still see (some) posts from the users you follow even if their instance is down at the moment.

also bridging AP/AT or adding AT support is fine, i think adding support for wonky Diaspora or GnuSocial is also good for federation generally.

Out of curiosity, have you looked into Hubzilla's Zot protocol? it seems to address many of the issues lacking from AP like identity management/privacy through cryptographic signatures, they have a 'nomadic identity' system that makes migration incredibly easy. But since Zot has such limited adoption it's hard to tell how well it works in practice.